Statistical Analysis
In
profiling, frequencies, and percentages were used.
Weighted
means were used to determine the descri0tors which described the professional
practices. The descriptive ratings 1 to
5 were used with 1 as the lowest and 5 the highest. Professional practices were described as
follows:
Rating
|
Description
|
5
|
Excellent,
superior teaching practices, highly skilled using a variety of teaching
strategies, exhibits efficient, facilitative leadership, applies knowledge in
real situations.
|
4
|
Very
Satisfactory, achieves results to a very
acceptable level, very capable
|
3
|
Satisfactory,
manifests good knowledge, efficient, achieves a high level of performance.
|
2
|
Fair,
slightly capable, works only to comply with objectives,
can still be improved.
|
1
|
Poor,
unsatisfactory performance, relies on others, has gaps in knowledge and
skills teacher needs much assistance to maintain an acceptable level of
performance.
|
The descriptors and their mean
ranges are as follows:
Rating
|
Mean Range
|
Descriptor
|
5
|
4.20 – 5.00
|
Excellent
|
4
|
3.40 – 4.19
|
Very Satisfactory
|
3
|
2.60 – 3.39
|
Satisfactory
|
2
|
1.80 – 2.59
|
Fair
|
1
|
1.00 – 1.79
|
Poor
|
The same ratings were used for
determining the level of performance of teaching effectiveness, the rubrics of
which are presented as follows:
Rating
|
Description
|
5
|
Highly
Effective, very effective, results-oriented
|
4
|
Effective,
capable and effective beyond required expectations
|
3
|
Moderately
Effective, exhibits good knowledge and efficient
|
2
|
Slightly
Effective, can still improve, works only to
comply.
|
1
|
Not
Effective, lacks professional teaching skills
|
The descriptors, the mean ranges,
and the performance level for teaching effectiveness are categorized as
follows:
Rating
|
Mean Range
|
Descriptor
|
5
|
4.20 – 5.00
|
Highly Effective Performance Level
|
4
|
3.40 – 4.19
|
Effective Performance Level
|
3
|
2.60 – 3.39
|
Moderately Effective Performance
Level
|
2
|
1.80 – 2.59
|
Slightly Effective Performance Level
|
1
|
1.00 – 1.79
|
Not Effective Performance Level
|
Title:
Statistical Analysis - Paper Example
by:
om
at
2013-02-16T13:07:00+07:00
Rating: 4.8
of 5 Reviews
Statistical Analysis - Paper Example